We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I was trying to optimize our tests run time and added
cfg.FastSyncInterval = 4 * time.Second cfg.FastSyncLimit = 100
to overwrite the default values but got:
https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/babylonchain/finality-provider/2033/workflows/819dcba3-8977-4759-a4f2-b3f6c2e55a35/jobs/6007/parallel-runs/1?filterBy=ALL
I think this might imply some serious problem which I think it's worth looking into
based on the error logs:
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x7f82a5e7fab2 pc=0xed752a] goroutine 304421 [running]: runtime.throw({0x6e73c94?, 0xc00586e900?}) /usr/local/go/src/runtime/panic.go:1077 +0x5c fp=0xc005d42f48 sp=0xc005d42f18 pc=0x4409bc runtime.sigpanic() /usr/local/go/src/runtime/signal_unix.go:875 +0x285 fp=0xc005d42fa8 sp=0xc005d42f48 pc=0x459f85 github.com/cometbft/cometbft/proto/tendermint/crypto.(*Proof).Unmarshal
seems exact root cause as #508 which we never really understood the root cause
also seems that simply changing the parameters triggered the problem again
cc @lesterli @SebastianElvis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I was trying to optimize our tests run time and added
to overwrite the default values but got:
https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/babylonchain/finality-provider/2033/workflows/819dcba3-8977-4759-a4f2-b3f6c2e55a35/jobs/6007/parallel-runs/1?filterBy=ALL
I think this might imply some serious problem which I think it's worth looking into
based on the error logs:
seems exact root cause as #508 which we never really understood the root cause
also seems that simply changing the parameters triggered the problem again
cc @lesterli @SebastianElvis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: