You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would rather go with some form of scientific notation rather than a single builtin for 100. Seeing how common the "00" 2-graph is, 100 is not the only problem.
The corpus analyser does work on overlapping matches, and doesn't care about matching part of a string in the "smaller" groups, so from the numbers we can see that 100 appears 11 times, and 00 21 (note that this isn't in 21 Husk programs, but that instead, of all Husk programs on CGCC there are 21 (potentially overlapping) occurrences of 00.
Nonetheless, a builtin for 100 that takes less than 3 bytes would likely be a good idea, as would a single byte for a space character, and some way of shortening fo=¹, either through assigning fo= to a single byte or some other way
(I've learnt more Husk since opening this issue :))
Similarly to this and this issues opened in the Jelly repo, I decided to run Lynn's method on Husk answers (with a few modifications).
SEDE query used to get all Husk answers on PPCG. Code used to analyse the data. Final corpus:
I'm not familiar enough with Husk to offer any informed suggestions or remarks, but I hope this helps!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: