We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There's a proposal (PEP 0467) to add a bytes.iterbytes method, that currently does the opposite of six.iterbytes
>>> tuple(b"ABC".iterbytes()) (b'A', b'B', b'C') >>> tuple(six.iterbytes(b"ABC")) (65, 66, 67)
in an ideal world I'd like to see:
>>> tuple(six.iterbytes(b"ABC")) (b'A', b'B', b'C') >>> tuple(six.iterords(b"ABC")) (65, 66, 67)
but that would require a major version change, as it's changing the existing six.iterbytes function
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
/cc @ncoghlan @ethanfurman
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
There's a proposal (PEP 0467) to add a bytes.iterbytes method, that currently does the opposite of six.iterbytes
in an ideal world I'd like to see:
but that would require a major version change, as it's changing the existing six.iterbytes function
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: