Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: Migrating Documentation to a Separate Website #1324

Closed
WailanTirajoh opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Proposal: Migrating Documentation to a Separate Website #1324

WailanTirajoh opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@WailanTirajoh
Copy link
Contributor

WailanTirajoh commented Apr 16, 2024

Given the increasing size of documentation, I propose migrating it to a separate website. I am willing to create a minimal example to demonstrate the process. If this approach aligns with goals, I can begin migrating the README documentation to the web-based platform.

I intend to utilize VitePress for the documentation website and consider using Vercel for hosting it for preview purposes.

Looking forward to your feedback and further discussion on this proposal.

@bensheldon
Copy link
Owner

I'm open if you wanted to mock something up with whatever you're comfortable with 👍

That said, I don't imagine I'd ever adopt VitePress / Vercel as the final form (there's already the /demo Rails site hosted on Heroku, and the option of GitHub Pages for a static site with something Ruby based like Jekyll).

I'll offer that I prefer the one-big-doc because it's easy for me to ctrl-f a keyword. Can you share more about the pain-points you'd want to address, or organizing principles? I can imagine something like more clearly demarcating:

  • Summary of features / justification
  • Quick Start instructions
  • Reference
  • Examples and narrative-based explainations

...but I'm curious about what you see. Are there improvements we can make to the current Readme?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants