BaseExecution::discrete_support? hardcodes the DiscreteExecution table_name

[gap777]

It seems like the BaseExecution::discrete_support? is giving us a false answer, b/c we're using custom table names and this has the table_name for DiscreteExecution hardcoded.

Instead of base_execution.rb, L37 being:

     def discrete_support?
        if connection.table_exists?('good_job_executions')
          true
        else
          migration_pending_warning!
          false
        end
      end

I believe it should be

     def discrete_support?
        if connection.table_exists?(DiscreteExecution.table_name)
          true
        else
          migration_pending_warning!
          false
        end
      end

If you agree, I can open a PR.

Thanks, and keep up the great work!

[bensheldon]

Nice catch! Yes, please open a PR.

[gap777]

#958 is open

[bensheldon]

@gap777 thank you! Released in https://github.com/bensheldon/good_job/releases/tag/v3.15.8