You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to specify a number of visits to put on each board position, as a different option from "time to spend on each board position".
Currently I end up with some fairly uneven visits on board positions - some positions get 700 visits, some get a few thousands, some apparently get up to 20 or 30. I imagine that some of these numbers are due to how q5go does the analysis in the reverse, so it reconnects to prior-done work in the analysis, but I'd like to have a minimum number of visits guaranteed on all board positions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well, the idea is that you choose the time setting to guarantee a minimum number of visits for the position - with reverse analysis giving you a bonus sometimes. As far as I remember, the engine doesn't report a number of visits for the position, only per-move.
Are you asking for a minimum number for the top move? That could probably be arranged.
Tools like katrain and lizzie are able to ask for a number of desired visits for a given board position (if I analyze the game and ask for 500 visits per move, every move in the game will have 500 visits, split between all the moves that katago looked at). I don't know how they do that, maybe they're doing more work client-side to tally up all the results?
It would be nice to specify a number of visits to put on each board position, as a different option from "time to spend on each board position".
Currently I end up with some fairly uneven visits on board positions - some positions get 700 visits, some get a few thousands, some apparently get up to 20 or 30. I imagine that some of these numbers are due to how q5go does the analysis in the reverse, so it reconnects to prior-done work in the analysis, but I'd like to have a minimum number of visits guaranteed on all board positions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: