You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Imagine an MRI BIDS dataset, which contains a T1w image and a single fMRI free run.
Neglecting the Inheritance Principle altogether, it might look something like:
There are many metadata fields that will be identical between these two images; things like scanner site, field strength. It would be nice to be able to use the Inheritance Principle to define this information just once in a file sub-01.json; ie.:
This however would not be currently permitted, as suffices are mandatory.
Conversely, having a data file without any suffix is hard to make sense of, as one would expect some mandatory indication of what kind of imaging contrast is present in data.
So the idea I'm toying with at the moment, is to make it mandatory for data files to have a suffix, but optional for metadata. This would allow singular definition of metadata fields that are common across image data of different contrasts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Relates to multiple existing issues; mostly bids-standard/bids-specification#1003, #65, #58.
Imagine an MRI BIDS dataset, which contains a T1w image and a single fMRI free run.
Neglecting the Inheritance Principle altogether, it might look something like:
There are many metadata fields that will be identical between these two images; things like scanner site, field strength. It would be nice to be able to use the Inheritance Principle to define this information just once in a file
sub-01.json
; ie.:This however would not be currently permitted, as suffices are mandatory.
Conversely, having a data file without any suffix is hard to make sense of, as one would expect some mandatory indication of what kind of imaging contrast is present in data.
So the idea I'm toying with at the moment, is to make it mandatory for data files to have a suffix, but optional for metadata. This would allow singular definition of metadata fields that are common across image data of different contrasts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: