You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Regarding the comment from @sappelhoff about latency channel, yes, the onset is intended to be the acq_time of scans.tsv and the text could be updated to make that clear.
That would also imply that the first sample should always have latency of 0, considering acq_time = when the first data point in each run was acquired.
ss[.000000] was not intended to imply integer digit limit. But I see how it is misleading.
Should we update the notation to s[.000000] and add that s refers to an integer of arbitrary number of digits?
This issue is to explicitly track these points which came up in another thread. Just to prevent this from being buried and forgotten, as it's important.
Originally posted by @sjeung in #1436 (comment)
This issue is to explicitly track these points which came up in another thread. Just to prevent this from being buried and forgotten, as it's important.
Related to:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: