Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cadence general discussion. #1

Open
bigeasy opened this issue Jul 2, 2012 · 5 comments
Open

Cadence general discussion. #1

bigeasy opened this issue Jul 2, 2012 · 5 comments

Comments

@bigeasy
Copy link
Owner

bigeasy commented Jul 2, 2012

Ask questions here.

@ghost ghost assigned bigeasy Jul 2, 2012
@bigeasy
Copy link
Owner Author

bigeasy commented Jul 7, 2012

Before this goes out, I need to be comfortable with the variable names.

Big one is $vargs versus $splat. The former is C sounding, but not what C actually calls them. The latter is Ruby sounding and comes to me from CoffeeScript.

@bigeasy
Copy link
Owner Author

bigeasy commented Jul 11, 2012

Explicitly named context names passed to cadence appear to be on the way out.

@bigeasy
Copy link
Owner Author

bigeasy commented Jul 14, 2012

I'm not going to add such a thing to Cadence, but I keep thinking about how to use Cadence to replace Bash scripts. What do I miss? Pipelines, redirection and globbing. What else do I miss?

  • Pipelines.
  • Redirection.
  • Globbing.
  • Opening and closing files easily.

Totally a separate project. You would have to have an answer for each of the core utils, plus diff.

@demarius
Copy link
Contributor

What do we want the documentation to look like in preparation for this release?

@bigeasy
Copy link
Owner Author

bigeasy commented Aug 28, 2013

You were doing great, actually. What probably needs to happen is we break up the documentation into steps, set an order for the steps, then go though them a step at a time. The documentation is already structured in this way.

As a first pass, it needs to simply take a stab at explaining each feature. Where I believe I can help is in designing first a good toy example for a property of Cadence, then a good real world example of a property of Cadence. Some of the current examples are toys, some are real world. We ought to have both for each step of the way.

@bigeasy bigeasy changed the title Release version 0.2.0. Cadence general discussion. Nov 1, 2020
@bigeasy bigeasy reopened this Nov 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants