Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For Cycle 20 #734

Closed
freimair opened this issue Dec 3, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

For Cycle 20 #734

freimair opened this issue Dec 3, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
parsed:valid https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team was:failed Indicates that DAO vote failed to complete.
Milestone

Comments

@freimair
Copy link
Member

freimair commented Dec 3, 2020

Summary

Specify the total amount of BSQ you are requesting, along with the USD total and BSQ/USD rate (don't include the brackets!):

  • BSQ requested: 4286
  • USD requested: 3000
  • BSQ rate: 0.70 USD per BSQ
  • Previous compensation request (if applicable): For Cycle 20 #709

Contributions delivered

Add contributions you have delivered and roles you have performed here as new rows in the table below. Role line-items should include an asterisk (*) in the team column.

Title Team USD Link Notes
Reduce bandwidth requirement on Bisq startup dev 3000 bisq-network/projects#25 the project got completed recently, and given the design is the design I came up with, I claim compensation for the feasibility study, the proof of concept implementation (bisq-network/bisq#4233), and some overhead + reduced to chimp's suggestion of being 50% of the projects initial value

A sidenote to this: It is pretty sad that Bisq treats his contributors that way. First, the desperately needed measures get delayed, then project proposals are required, then the proposals get ignored, then delayed and finally, after the work is done, someone comes along, uses the production-ready code to create a similar PR which then gets merged and all the work done over months are denied compensation. It seems like again Bisq only values a written line of code - not the data collection, investigation, design steps to create a proper solution.

Besides that, I know, I already left the project. And there are people in Bisq which seem to be very keen to get me out. And after I am gone there is no point in compensating anything really - it is at least common practice in the industry. And I firmly believed that Bisq is different, yet, Bisq steals from me. 1k5$ (#709 (comment)) for the project is not compensation, it is a message - and I got it the first time around.

That being said, may Bisq prevail, I certainly hope so. Yet, I fear that there are some radical changes necessary which might not come in time.

Contributions in progress

Provide links to work you're involved with that is still in progress. This section is optional (the linter ignores it), and is for your own benefit in keeping track of what you're doing and keeping other contributors up to date with the same.

@ghost ghost added parsed:valid https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team labels Dec 3, 2020
@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Dec 3, 2020

Proposal phase ended, this proposal should be submitted for Cycle 20. Please edit the title.

@freimair freimair changed the title For Cycle 19 For Cycle 20 Dec 3, 2020
@freimair freimair added this to the Cycle 20 milestone Dec 23, 2020
@freimair
Copy link
Member Author

@MwithM @ripcurlx this cr is not in the review project. Any reason for that?

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Dec 29, 2020

No, I just forgot to put it into, sorry.

@freimair
Copy link
Member Author

freimair commented Jan 1, 2021

Since time is running short and it seems like this CR is not going to get a nACK/ACK in time (again), I file the CR anyways and thereby trust the Bisq community to come to a proper conclusion.

c71bce3791ccd0aac96360976a7cc1e3b94bc4b8801bfad7e02d4ef1106b76a8

@MwithM MwithM added the was:failed Indicates that DAO vote failed to complete. label Jan 10, 2021
@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Jan 10, 2021

Cycle 20 DAO vote failed. Submit a new DAO request for next cycle.

@MwithM MwithM closed this as completed Jan 10, 2021
@freimair freimair mentioned this issue Jan 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
parsed:valid https://bisq.wiki/Compensation#Ensure_your_request_is_valid team:dev https://bisq.wiki/Dev_Team was:failed Indicates that DAO vote failed to complete.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants