Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About BSIP 39: make the approval optional #71

Closed
abitmore opened this issue Mar 23, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed

About BSIP 39: make the approval optional #71

abitmore opened this issue Mar 23, 2018 · 9 comments
Assignees

Comments

@abitmore
Copy link
Member

Since sometimes the proposer don't want to approve immediately, it's better if she has an option to decide whether approve.

@xeroc
Copy link
Member

xeroc commented Mar 27, 2018

You recommend to extend "proposal_create" with another extension to add a "flag" for this? Something like, "add_proposers_approval"?

@abitmore
Copy link
Member Author

You recommend to extend "proposal_create" with another extension to add a "flag" for this? Something like, "add_proposers_approval"?

Yes. IMHO it's not a security related change, changing default behavior is not the best option. It's better to maintain backward compatibility, avoid breaking existing applications.

@xeroc
Copy link
Member

xeroc commented May 28, 2018

How about an extension to the proposal_create_operation that let's you define whether to auto-approve or not?

@abitmore
Copy link
Member Author

How about an extension to the proposal_create_operation that let's you define whether to auto-approve or not?

That's the idea..

@syalon
Copy link
Member

syalon commented Aug 22, 2019

Is this BSIP currently suspended? I see that the initial version of the PR has been submitted and is also considered backward compatible. We should probably complete the final draft of BSIP and conduct voting. What do you think? @xeroc

@ryanRfox
Copy link
Contributor

ryanRfox commented Aug 22, 2019

No @syalon this BSIP is still in draft state.

@xeroc I feel this BSIP should be cleaned up slightly before we put it up for a vote:

In my opinion it was merged prior to "done" but that's just an opportunity to revise it now. The concept is good and should be put to vote.

@abitmore
Copy link
Member Author

abitmore commented Oct 2, 2019

Please review PR #235.

@ryanRfox
Copy link
Contributor

ryanRfox commented Oct 3, 2019

Thank you @abitmore for addressing the items in the list above. I ticked them off as complete. Let's proceed within the PR for review, merge and ultimately voting.

@abitmore
Copy link
Member Author

Done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants