-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a deadline timeout when calling Nevergreen server -> CI server #254
Comments
Hi @GentlemanHal , I was thinking of solving this issue using circuit breaker pattern. We can break the circuit from nevergreen -> ci server after a certain threshold is reached and when UI is polling it'll get the same response for some time until the circuit is established again. Let me know your thoughts on this and then I can pick this one up. |
Hi @jainsahab , thanks for offering to help! My first thought is the circuit breaker pattern might be overkill for the issue. I'd be interested in hearing some specific implementations details however. Some things to consider:
I'm thinking that adding the deadline timeout as originally stated (or finding an alternative library that provides the functionality out the box) is the way to close this issue, and maybe doing something more complicated like circuit breaking to solve issue #199. |
sure @GentlemanHal , Yes. Having a circuit breaker would add the overhead of maintaining persistent storage. and it would be a bit difficult to maintain when having multiple CIs configured on UI. then, I'll go with the originally stated solution by you. Thanks :) |
Done via pull request #293 |
The current timeouts when calling Nevergreen server -> CI server are for establishing the initial connection and for receiving each packet of data. Whereas the timeouts when calling the UI -> Nevergreen server are for receiving the first packet of data and a deadline for the entire response to complete.
This means if the CI server is responding slowly the Nevergreen server wouldn't timeout but the UI would. Given we've added automatic retries as part of #238 and the monitor view could be polling every 5 seconds, this could result in loads of extra calls to a CI server already responding slowly.
We should add a deadline timeout to the CI server calls that matches the timeout of the UI. This would mean the server timeouts at the same time as the UI, and we wouldn't be stacking calls to a probably broken CI server.
Unfortunately this isn't simple with
clj-http
, which is the library we are using to make http calls, it requires adding a manual timer and aborting the request if it takes too long as per this example: https://github.com/dakrone/clj-http#cancelling-requestsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: