Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discrepancy for between minimap2 and mm2-fast for assembly alignment #5

Open
jdwinkler opened this issue Sep 2, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@jdwinkler
Copy link

Hi,

Thanks for your work on this optimized version of minimap2, I think it is quite useful. I was recently building out a pipeline involving the pairwise alignment of possibly divergent (~75% ANI) assemblies and noticed that minimap2 and mm2-fast do not give the same result. The underlying command was:

minimap2 -x asm20 assembly_a assembly_b

I know this is not really the intended purpose of minimap2, but I thought it strange that the results were not consistent between your fork and the main branch. I can find example NCBI assemblies to give different results if you want to look into it?

@jdwinkler
Copy link
Author

jdwinkler commented Sep 2, 2022

I will also check to make sure I am compare like versions as well, that could potentially be the source of the problem I think.

edit: at 2.24 for both tools, I see different alignments when comparing fragmented MAGs.

@joydddd
Copy link

joydddd commented Oct 26, 2022

Hi jdwinkler, we're working on accelerating pairwise alignment on GPU and I'm also running into inconsistent results between minimap2 2.24, the algorithm described in the Minimap2 paper, and this mm2-fast kernel. I'm digging into these divergent results. Could you share some example NCBI assemblies with me?

@jdwinkler
Copy link
Author

Yes, let me dig those up tomorrow US time and I'll send you a couple public assemblies.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants