Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 8, 2021. It is now read-only.

Permissive Default License #59

Closed
Slakah opened this issue Nov 20, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Permissive Default License #59

Slakah opened this issue Nov 20, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@Slakah
Copy link
Contributor

Slakah commented Nov 20, 2017

Looking at line

Seq("Apache-2.0" -> url("http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0"))
. This feels a little dangerous, I doubt most of our internal projects are actually Apache licensed projects, and it feels a little too easy to forget to remove this license.

I would have thought that we would probably default to an all rights reserved license, allowing any project maintainer to easily amend to a more permissive license. (IANAL), but I would imagine that once a piece of source code is issued with a permissive license, then that license would be applied forever (it's not possible to remove the permissions granted by that license).

I'm all for open software, but it should be a conscious choice by the owner/maintainer of the software in question.

@carlpulley
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure I agree with this?

These build.sbt settings apply (or rather should!) to sbt-cake only - hence why it has a permissive license. For BAMTech Media uses of sbt-cake, we fully expect that teams will define there own licenses (probably not relevant now for BAMTech Media projects?).

@Slakah
Copy link
Contributor Author

Slakah commented Jan 11, 2018

I'm not sure I agree with this?

These build.sbt settings apply (or rather should!) to sbt-cake only - hence why it has a permissive license. For BAMTech Media uses of sbt-cake, we fully expect that teams will define there own licenses (probably not relevant now for BAMTech Media projects?).

Doh!

Raised this against the wrong repo, meant to raise this against https://github.com/cakesolutions/play-scala-template.g8 .

Apologies!

Edit: the proper issue cakesolutions/play-scala-template.g8#55

@Slakah Slakah closed this as completed Jan 11, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants