Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standard names: Spelling mistake in "realization" description #124

Closed
davidhassell opened this issue Feb 4, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Standard names: Spelling mistake in "realization" description #124

davidhassell opened this issue Feb 4, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary

Comments

@davidhassell
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello,

I have spotted a spelling mistake in the description of the realization standard name - the asa in Realization is used to label a dimension that can be thought of asa statistical sample, e.g., labelling members of a model ensemble.

Proposer's name David Hassell
Date 2021-02-04

The corrected description is:

- Term realization
- Description Realization is used to label a dimension that can be thought of as a statistical sample, e.g., labelling members of a model ensemble.
- Units 1

Thanks

@davidhassell davidhassell added the standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary label Feb 4, 2021
@feggleton
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks David, I have now added this to the cfeditor. I will mark this as accepted to go into the next update as I'm sure there won't be a discussion on this!

@japamment
Copy link
Member

Changes applied in version 78 of the standard name table.

@feggleton feggleton transferred this issue from cf-convention/discuss Jul 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants