Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

difference between area types "ice_sheet" and "land_ice" #192

Closed
taylor13 opened this issue Sep 27, 2022 · 13 comments
Closed

difference between area types "ice_sheet" and "land_ice" #192

taylor13 opened this issue Sep 27, 2022 · 13 comments
Labels
accepted Agreed for inclusion in the next release of the standard name table or other controlled vocabulary standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary

Comments

@taylor13
Copy link

I must be missing something obvious, but the area types table includes:

land_ice: "Land ice" means glaciers, ice-caps, grounded ice sheets resting on bedrock and floating ice-shelves.
and
ice_sheet: An area type of "ice sheet" indicates where ice sheets are present. It includes both grounded ice sheets resting over bedrock and ice shelves flowing over the ocean, but excludes ice-caps and glaciers (in contrast to land_ice, which includes all components).

I would have thought if we needed both of these, the two descriptions would have been reversed (i.e., land_ice, not ice_sheet would exclude ice-caps and glaciers.

Can someone explain why the terminology is appropriate?

@taylor13 taylor13 added the question Further information is requested label Sep 27, 2022
@JonathanGregory
Copy link
Contributor

The area type table is consistent with the use of these words in IPCC and Earth system modelling, I would say. "Land ice" is the general term for ice which is made from snowfall on land (including on land ice), distinguishing it from "sea ice", which is made of frozen seawater and snowfall on sea ice. The distinction between the types of land ice body (ice sheet, icecap and glacier) is a bit vague and is essentially to do with size. A glacier is comparatively small and mostly confined by bedrock topography, whose form strongly affects its surface topography. An ice sheet is so large that it buries the bedrock topography, and its surface topography is mostly determined by surface mass balance and ice dynamics. An icecap is something intermediate in size. There are only two ice sheets in the modern world viz on Greenland and on Antarctica (where East and West are sometimes regarded as distinct) but there are at least 200e3 glaciers.

@taylor13
Copy link
Author

thanks for the clarification. My confusion primarily stemmed from thinking of a cap as an ice sheet covering the "top of the earth" (i.e., one of the poles). Obviously, incorrect.

There is perhaps a small tweak I might suggest, however. To make the distinction cleaner, could we exclude from "ice_sheet) not only ice caps and glaciers, but also the ice shelves associated with them? It seems odd to me to include the ice_shelf attached to a glacier but not the glacier itself. Of course, the ice shelves associated with a proper ice_sheet would be included in the "ice_sheet" type.

@JonathanGregory
Copy link
Contributor

Ah, I see. Yes, "ice cap" is sometimes used to mean polar sea ice, isn't it. "Ice sheet" includes both grounded ice and ice shelves, as the current text correctly says. People often write phrases like "grounded ice sheet" when they want to clarify that ice shelves should be excluded.

@taylor13
Copy link
Author

Yes, I know Ice_sheet includes both grounded ice and ice shelves, but it doesn't say it only includes the ice shelves connected to the ice sheet. I misinterpreted the description as including both ice shelves attached to the ice_sheet and also ice shelves attached to any other land ice (e.g., attached to glaciers). I think the ice shelves attached to glaciers should be explicitly excluded. The current description is:

ice_sheet: An area type of "ice sheet" indicates where ice sheets are present. It includes both grounded ice sheets resting over bedrock and ice shelves flowing over the ocean, but excludes ice-caps and glaciers (in contrast to land_ice, which includes all components).

Could we revise this to:

ice_sheet: An area type of "ice sheet" indicates where ice sheets are present. It includes both grounded ice sheets resting over bedrock and any ice shelves flowing over the ocean that are attached to it, but it excludes ice-caps and glaciers (in contrast to land_ice, which includes all components).

I suppose most would not have misinterpreted what we currently have, but I, for one, did.

@JonathanGregory
Copy link
Contributor

Dear Karl

Ah, thanks, I see what you mean now. Yes, I agree, that would be useful to clarify. Maybe to be even more explicit we could say "but it excludes ice-caps and glaciers and any floating ice shelves and ice tongues attached to them".

Best wishes

Jonathan

@taylor13
Copy link
Author

I would be happy with that. Thanks.

@JonathanGregory JonathanGregory added standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary and removed question Further information is requested labels Sep 30, 2022
@JonathanGregory
Copy link
Contributor

Dear Alison @japamment et al.

As discussed in this issue, Karl and I propose that the definition for the ice_sheet area type should be clarified, to read

An area type of "ice sheet" indicates where ice sheets are present. It includes both grounded ice sheets resting over bedrock and any ice shelves flowing over the ocean that are attached to grounded ice sheets. The ice_sheet area excludes ice-caps and glaciers and any floating ice shelves and ice tongues attached to them, but the land_ice area includes those as well the ice_sheet area.

Here, I've rephrased the last part, hoping to make it even clearer.

Best wishes

Jonathan

@taylor13
Copy link
Author

Seems clear to me now. Thanks, Jonathan and Alison.

@JonathanGregory
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for raising the issue, Karl.

@feggleton
Copy link
Collaborator

That clarification seems sensible. Thanks.

@feggleton feggleton added the accept within 7 days Starts 7 day countdown to accept a change to standard names or other controlled vocabulary label Nov 2, 2022
@feggleton feggleton added accepted Agreed for inclusion in the next release of the standard name table or other controlled vocabulary and removed accept within 7 days Starts 7 day countdown to accept a change to standard names or other controlled vocabulary labels Nov 15, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has had no activity in the last 30 days. This is a reminder to please comment on standard name requests to assist with agreement and acceptance. Standard name moderators are also reminded to review @feggleton @japamment

@github-actions github-actions bot added the moderator attention (added by GitHub action) Moderators are requested to consider this issue label Mar 24, 2023
@feggleton feggleton removed the moderator attention (added by GitHub action) Moderators are requested to consider this issue label Apr 6, 2023
@japamment
Copy link
Member

@taylor13 @JonathanGregory

Thanks for clarifying the ice_sheet area type definition - anything we can do to make meanings clear and unambiguous is always an improvement!

I will make this change in the area type table update this week.

Best wishes

Alison

@japamment
Copy link
Member

I am closing this ticket as the proposed change has been published in V11 of the area type table.

@efisher008 efisher008 transferred this issue from cf-convention/discuss Jul 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted Agreed for inclusion in the next release of the standard name table or other controlled vocabulary standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants