You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Howdy. I am forever telling collaborators that they should not write units like mol/m3/uatm, or g/m2/s and that they should instead write "mol m-3 uatm-1" or "mol/(m3 uatm)". However, I find it difficult to point to a place in the CF-spec that states this clearly. Is this written explicitly somewhere? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
All three of mol/m3/uatm, mol m-3 uatm-1 and mol/(m3 uatm) all allowed by the UDUNITS syntax, and all describe exactly the same units, i.e. 9.86923266716013 m-2.kg-1.s2.mol. So whilst I personally am also not so fond of the "x/y/z" formatting, I think it's perfectly legal, I'm afraid!
David, thanks for your comments. I'm baffled as to why x/y/z would be legal syntax. Isn't that mathematically equivalent to (xz)/y, as opposed to the intended x/(yz)? Anyway, I guess I should take up my question with the UDUNITS folks.
Howdy. I am forever telling collaborators that they should not write units like mol/m3/uatm, or g/m2/s and that they should instead write "mol m-3 uatm-1" or "mol/(m3 uatm)". However, I find it difficult to point to a place in the CF-spec that states this clearly. Is this written explicitly somewhere? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: