Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with wind shear standard names #83

Closed
emilye12 opened this issue Dec 22, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Issue with wind shear standard names #83

emilye12 opened this issue Dec 22, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
accepted Agreed for inclusion in the next release of the standard name table or other controlled vocabulary standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary

Comments

@emilye12
Copy link

Question/potential issue with vertical directional wind shear:
In the last proposal we submitted (Standard Names: Meteorological Standard Names Proposal for CAMPS #55), we requested 9 wind shear variables and all were accepted. After reviewing our own work, as we were preparing our second standard name proposal submission, we realized that there were 2 wind shear variables already present in the standard name table at the time our proposal was accepted.

Standard names prior to our proposal:
eastward_wind_shear
northward_wind_shear

Definitions:
"Eastward (northward)" indicates a vector component which is positive when directed eastward (northward) (negative westward (southward)). Wind is defined as a two-dimensional (horizontal) air velocity vector, with no vertical component. (Vertical motion in the atmosphere has the standard name upward_air_velocity.) Wind shear is the derivative of wind with respect to height.

Possibly equivalent standard names added by our last proposal:
upward_derivative_of_northward_wind
upward_derivative_of_eastward_wind

Definitions:
The quantity with standard name upward_derivative_of_eastward(northward)_wind is the derivative of the eastward(northward) component of wind with respect to height. The phrase "component_derivative_of_X" means derivative of X with respect to distance in the component direction, which may be "northward", "southward", "eastward", "westward", "upward", "downward", "x" or "y". The last two indicate derivatives along the axes of the grid, in the case where they are not true longitude and latitude. A positive value indicates that X is increasing with distance along the positive direction of the axis. Wind is defined as a two-dimensional (horizontal) air velocity vector, with no vertical component. (Vertical motion in the atmosphere has the standard name "upward_air_velocity").

A possible 3rd overlap:
There is also a standard name “wind_speed_shear” which appears to be a more generic way of describing the speed shear in general. Basically, this is the magnitude of the vector components of speed shear.

Definition:
Speed is the magnitude of velocity. Wind is defined as a two-dimensional (horizontal) air velocity vector, with no vertical component. (Vertical motion in the atmosphere has the standard name upward_air_velocity.) The wind speed is the magnitude of the wind velocity. Wind speed shear is the derivative of wind speed with respect to height.

Solution:
We can see how the term “wind_speed_shear” could co-exist with the two terms that break that down to the two velocity vectors. But for the other 4 terms, it seems like these are simply a set of 2 standard names that mean roughly the exact same thing. Given they now all exist, would an alias be appropriate for the 2 sets of overlapping standard names? I’m not sure how we all overlooked this before! Sorry about that!!

Emily Schlie, Eric Engle and the CAMPS team

@JonathanGregory
Copy link
Contributor

Dear @emilye12

Thanks for noticing. I think the newly agreed standard names are better than than existing ones! I'd be happy if the existing ones were made aliases of your new ones.

Best wishes

Jonathan

@japamment japamment self-assigned this Jan 11, 2021
@japamment japamment added the standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary label Jan 11, 2021
@emilye12
Copy link
Author

@JonathanGregory

Great! I agree, but I'm biased. I do think the language of the new ones agree better as a whole than before though. And are more descriptive.

We appreciate the response!

@feggleton
Copy link
Collaborator

@japamment we need to do a bit of sorting here to deprecate the old terms and then create alias'.

@feggleton feggleton added the add to cfeditor (added by template) Moderators are requested to add this proposal to the CF editor label Apr 24, 2023
@feggleton
Copy link
Collaborator

@japamment let's discuss this one on Monday.

@efisher008
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @emilye12,

As there seems to be a general agreement to make this change, I've marked this for "accept within 7 days" and will hopefully make this change with @japamment by the end of next week.

Best regards,
Ellie

@efisher008 efisher008 added the accept within 7 days Starts 7 day countdown to accept a change to standard names or other controlled vocabulary label Nov 23, 2023
@efisher008 efisher008 added accepted Agreed for inclusion in the next release of the standard name table or other controlled vocabulary and removed accept within 7 days Starts 7 day countdown to accept a change to standard names or other controlled vocabulary add to cfeditor (added by template) Moderators are requested to add this proposal to the CF editor labels Dec 6, 2023
@efisher008
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @emilye12,

These changes have been made in the editor and the former names will be kept as aliases. The standalone versions of the new names (proposed on 2020/06/12) will be removed from the standard names table before publication. Thank you again!

Best regards,
Ellie

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted Agreed for inclusion in the next release of the standard name table or other controlled vocabulary standard name (added by template) Requests and discussions for standard names and other controlled vocabulary
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants