You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Single-cell data is sparse (i.e. there are many zeros), and the difference between not-expressed (zero) and expressed (1, 2, 3, ...) can be highly informative. Currently cellxgene plots data using a colormap that does not distinguish zeros. This makes it often near-impossible to distinguish low expression from no expression.
I suggest to first plot all cells in a light grey shade. This shows the position of every cell, regardless of expression. Then, plot all non-zeros on top, using a perceptually uniform, linear colormap that goes from 1 (assuming integer expression values as in 10x Chromium; otherwise use the lowest non-zero value) to the 99th percentile of the data. Of course plot non-zeros in random order.
The difference is stark, as in the example below showing AQP4 expression in glioblasts in the human developing brain:
With the common approach of just plotting zeros as the lowest value in the colormap, it becomes near-impossible to distinguish low expression from no expression.
My group has used this approach for many years and it is really preferable. It could be implemented in cellxgene using a checkbox "Use grey for zeros".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Single-cell data is sparse (i.e. there are many zeros), and the difference between not-expressed (zero) and expressed (1, 2, 3, ...) can be highly informative. Currently cellxgene plots data using a colormap that does not distinguish zeros. This makes it often near-impossible to distinguish low expression from no expression.
I suggest to first plot all cells in a light grey shade. This shows the position of every cell, regardless of expression. Then, plot all non-zeros on top, using a perceptually uniform, linear colormap that goes from 1 (assuming integer expression values as in 10x Chromium; otherwise use the lowest non-zero value) to the 99th percentile of the data. Of course plot non-zeros in random order.
The difference is stark, as in the example below showing AQP4 expression in glioblasts in the human developing brain:
With the common approach of just plotting zeros as the lowest value in the colormap, it becomes near-impossible to distinguish low expression from no expression.
My group has used this approach for many years and it is really preferable. It could be implemented in cellxgene using a checkbox "Use grey for zeros".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: