Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve multiple side by side package behavior during install #2577

Closed
TheCakeIsNaOH opened this issue Feb 5, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Improve multiple side by side package behavior during install #2577

TheCakeIsNaOH opened this issue Feb 5, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@TheCakeIsNaOH
Copy link
Member

TheCakeIsNaOH commented Feb 5, 2022

Counterpart to #103
I didn't see an issue for install, only for upgrade.

As noted in a todo comment

//todo: #2577 get smarter about realizing multiple versions have been installed before and allowing that
IPackage installedPackage = packageManager.LocalRepository.FindPackage(packageName);

@gep13
Copy link
Member

gep13 commented Feb 5, 2022

@TheCakeIsNaOH This one I am not sure about. Usage of side by side installation argument is not recommended, as it causes known problems during upgrade. This one will need more discussion before anything can be done on it.

@TheCakeIsNaOH
Copy link
Member Author

@gep13 No skin off my nose either way.

@vexx32
Copy link
Member

vexx32 commented Sep 30, 2022

Related issues:

Given we apparently don't want to have the side-by-side functionality in its current form (per #2788), perhaps we should close this issue?

@TheCakeIsNaOH
Copy link
Member Author

As side by side installations have been deprecated, this issue is no longer relevant: #2787

@TheCakeIsNaOH TheCakeIsNaOH closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 1, 2022
@harpreet20oct
Copy link

As side by side installations have been deprecated, is there any way or work around to do side by side installation. not sure whether -m switch does the same

@pauby
Copy link
Member

pauby commented Apr 7, 2023

There are some suggestions over on #2878.

@chocolatey chocolatey locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 7, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants