Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set up automated update of packed tz data #22

Closed
neoeinstein opened this issue Jun 30, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Set up automated update of packed tz data #22

neoeinstein opened this issue Jun 30, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@neoeinstein
Copy link

With the goal of keeping the crate's packed tz data up to date, we should consider setting up an automated system that will publish a new version (possibly using the build metadata field instead of incrementing the patch version) whenever the tz repository is updated.

i am willing to work on writing up a job that can make this functional and/or doing the initial manual upkeep.

@quodlibetor
Copy link
Contributor

This is a great idea! What kind of automated system were you imagining?

@neoeinstein
Copy link
Author

It's been a while, but I saw that this had partially been done now with a Github action. That action is broken at the moment, but I've submitted #79 to fix it again. I'd be happy to assist in getting more regular deployments going again (I see that the latest PRs haven't been merged or published), so that when the TZ update PR is merged, it gets pushed out to crates.io.

@pitdicker
Copy link
Contributor

The GitHub Action was broken again and removed in #159. From that PR:

Because we need to check the changes anyway to see if they would be a breaking change, and we manually have to increase the version number of chrono-tz and publish a release, I don't think this action gives much benefit.

@pitdicker pitdicker closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Apr 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants