-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrate documentation to VitePress #115
Comments
Yes, I also think Vitepress has a relatively clean configuration. As for version management, you can use Vercel or Netlify because these two tools produce a unique URL address every time it is deployed and it will never disappear |
Oh! I did not know that was possible. Thanks @ajiho ! |
Changing course (again), plan is to continue to use Asciidoctor primarily because it provides a means to export documentation for offline usages which is important for countries where Internet access is a luxury. I have come across several Stack Overflow questions on offline documentation in the last few months which has influenced my decision. VitePress does not have an official solution and instead delegates to third party/OSS projects. Asciidoctor on the other hand, provides first class support for exporting to PDF as well as EPUB3. |
Various documentation tools were explored as part of #97. The primary reason to migrate to VitePress is the minimal setup.
There is only a single file needed to get going:
config.mts
. Everything else is markdown content for documentation. Compared to Antora and Docusaurus where several files and configurations were required to get going.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: