Replies: 2 comments
-
@amercader The discussion is really hard-to-trace as it was in Slack - https://frictionlessdata.slack.com/archives/C0369HZ2SLT/p1661437372374169 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
E.g. Frictionless Application db has a schema (simplified just to share the idea):
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
(prompted by this comment)
@roll do you mean changing the way resources are represented in the API and/or the internal model for resources?
As much as I dislike some of the choices made in the resource representation it's part of an API that has been around forever, so changing things like
name
orurl
to make them fit the Data Resource standard would mean a new API version, which might be fine down the line, but a very strong case would have to be made for it:If you meant how resources are handled internally, could you give an example? I'm not clear on what you mean
Is the DKAN discussion publicly available? I'd be curious to check it
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions