-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Secrets truncation #168
Comments
Hey there! Sorry you're running into trouble. Just to confirm: are you providing your secret values via The other thing I want to point out are GitHub Actions' secrets limits. Is it possible you're running into these limits? Either way, we need to ensure the action fails and tells you why if this is the case. |
Yup, values for both |
Hmm, I haven't been able to reproduce this issue. I set up a test repo and ran the action, which you can see here: I was able to verify that 15 secrets were successfully uploaded. Is there any chance you can put together a reproduction? |
This repo and its structure is pretty big for reproduction. If we can message somewhere more private, I can provide full logs and workflow runs. |
You can shoot me a message at the same username on Discord and I can dig in further. |
For the sake of anyone who might stumble upon this later, the issue was a 13KB (the limit is 5KB) secret value was attempting to be uploaded, but there was an invisible |
Uploading a worker with many secrets only partially uploads the secrets but no error or warning is emitted - all success. Looking in the worker dashboard, the secret is simply not listed.
We're way under the 128 combined vars/secrets limit.
Started noticing this behavior on the 11th secret. And the extra secrets (past 10) that doesn't get updated appears to be random (only tested on 3 builds - need more data to be sure about this.
Actions is set to use
latest
worker versionThis is not a new worker (so I don't think its related to #162), but these are new secrets (compared to previous deployments of the same worker)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: