Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 3, 2023. It is now read-only.

wrangler's configuration format #83

Closed
xtuc opened this issue May 1, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

wrangler's configuration format #83

xtuc opened this issue May 1, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@xtuc
Copy link
Member

xtuc commented May 1, 2019

We talked with @ashleygwilliams about a non-Rust nor JS centric configuration format.

I don't think we reached consensus on a format. I propose using yaml (and toml for backward compatiblity).

@xtuc
Copy link
Member Author

xtuc commented May 15, 2019

We should consider what wrangler generate should do? what configuration? flags?

@ashleygwilliams
Copy link
Contributor

for the moment i think we are settling on the toml file and we'll explore further options as people request them! i'm going to close, but please reopen if i'm mistaken and there are still outstanding questions

@koistya
Copy link

koistya commented May 16, 2022

I'm also voting for yaml to make it more inlie with other DevOps tools. Check this out:
toml-lang/toml#516 (comment)

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants