Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow empty app_domains again #713

Closed
ampersand8 opened this issue Nov 4, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

allow empty app_domains again #713

ampersand8 opened this issue Nov 4, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@ampersand8
Copy link

ampersand8 commented Nov 4, 2016

Issue
Since the commit ab24f0a3bab0f49abcb05a43968bb52d1d65592a it's mandatory to set at least one app domain in cf.yml. So we're currently forced to set a fake domain, which is visible but not of any use to the customer.

Context
Deployment of cf with bosh with capi 1.7.0. when no app_domain is set in cf.yml.

Solution suggestion
I would suggest to revert commit ab24f0a3bab0f49abcb05a43968bb52d1d65592a, so that people can choose whether or not they want to set an app_domain as PaaS provider.

@cf-gitbot
Copy link

We have created an issue in Pivotal Tracker to manage this:

https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/133771663

The labels on this github issue will be updated when the story is started.

@SocalNick
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ampersand8 - I think we can remove this constraint. We were trying to improve the seeding code to allow a subdomain of the system domain, but I don't think the requirement of having app_domains is necessary.

CAPI, whoever picks this up, I think it's ok to revert that commit, please let me know otherwise.

@nicregez
Copy link

nicregez commented Dec 6, 2016

Thanks a lot @SocalNick for helping us with this issue.
By when are you going to release it, or more precisely, in which CF release will we see this fixed?

@SocalNick
Copy link
Contributor

Best I can do is "upcoming release". The CAPI team has been struggling a bit with CI which has caused acceptance to pile up. Thanks for your patience in the matter.

@SocalNick
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants