Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
50 lines (32 loc) · 1.7 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

50 lines (32 loc) · 1.7 KB

Alignment between SWEET and OBOs

ALPHA DO NOT TRUST THE RESULTS HERE YET

This repo contains a pipeline and results for aligning the various ESIP SWEET ontologies with OBOs.

Currently this is automated but the goal is to learn from a seed of initial curated equivalence axioms using kboom.

Running the pipeline

make setup
. env.sh
make

On subsequent runs, you do not need make setup. This clones SWEET into this repo and downloads owltools.

In the same terminal session you only need to do . env.sh once

Results

Each file is the export of a python dataframe with a mapping and a variety of scores and information. Consult ontobio docs for explanation (TODO)

Note that at this stage it is expected the results include false positives, e.g:

http://sweetontology.net/realmCryo#Calf,,UBERON:0003823,hindlimb zeugopod

clearly an ice calf is not the same as the "calf" of your leg. We will add high level axioms as 'training' and iterate improving results

Methods

We use ontobio-lexmap

sweet classes typically do not have rdfs:labels (some do). We take the URI fragment and split the camel case to generate tokenized labels for each class (this is done automatically by lexmap.py).

Note that sweet classes do not have synonyms - instead sweet has equivalence axioms linking two concepts deemed identical. This is in contrast to OBOs, where we would merge equivalent classes and make the label from one be a synonym of the other.

When attempting to map, we treat each sweet class as distinct, even if they are connected by equivalence axioms. We opt not to do a pre-merging step. This means that we will have some apparent false negatives, but these will be incorporated at the reasoning stage.