-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make docs more clear about how to work with the current api #1337
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 🐯
Should we update the sample file too? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing status just so we don't accidentally merge until @SantoDE has amended the sample file too.
Ping @SantoDE ;) |
@SantoDE Do you have time to update the sample file? |
e019a90
to
48a43c6
Compare
Hey @timoreimann & @ldez , done ;-) |
@SantoDE can you change the PR from v1.2 to master |
48a43c6
to
9a0907c
Compare
@ldez done :) |
Update of |
9a0907c
to
14d5963
Compare
Ah, yeah! :D Sorry. we have to many examples 👼 done @timoreimann |
14d5963
to
c1f4a13
Compare
@@ -996,43 +996,43 @@ | |||
# | |||
# Optional | |||
# | |||
#[rancher] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we want to leave all ranger configuration parameters commented out, as with the other providers in the sample file.
AFAIU, the idea is that users copy the file and uncomment just what they need.
See also #1455.
cc @containous/traefik :)