Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make docs more clear about how to work with the current api #1337

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2017

Conversation

SantoDE
Copy link
Collaborator

@SantoDE SantoDE commented Mar 24, 2017

cc @containous/traefik :)

Copy link
Contributor

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🐯

@timoreimann
Copy link
Contributor

Should we update the sample file too?

Copy link
Contributor

@timoreimann timoreimann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changing status just so we don't accidentally merge until @SantoDE has amended the sample file too.

@emilevauge
Copy link
Member

Ping @SantoDE ;)

@ldez
Copy link
Contributor

ldez commented Apr 19, 2017

@SantoDE Do you have time to update the sample file?

@SantoDE SantoDE force-pushed the fix/rancher_docs branch 2 times, most recently from e019a90 to 48a43c6 Compare April 24, 2017 14:57
@SantoDE
Copy link
Collaborator Author

SantoDE commented Apr 24, 2017

Hey @timoreimann & @ldez ,

done ;-)

@ldez
Copy link
Contributor

ldez commented Apr 24, 2017

@SantoDE can you change the PR from v1.2 to master

@SantoDE SantoDE changed the base branch from v1.2 to master April 24, 2017 15:05
@SantoDE
Copy link
Collaborator Author

SantoDE commented Apr 24, 2017

@ldez done :)

@ldez ldez self-requested a review April 24, 2017 15:46
@timoreimann
Copy link
Contributor

Update of traefik.sample.toml still outstanding?

@SantoDE
Copy link
Collaborator Author

SantoDE commented Apr 25, 2017

Ah, yeah! :D Sorry. we have to many examples 👼

done @timoreimann

@@ -996,43 +996,43 @@
#
# Optional
#
#[rancher]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we want to leave all ranger configuration parameters commented out, as with the other providers in the sample file.

AFAIU, the idea is that users copy the file and uncomment just what they need.

See also #1455.

@ldez ldez dismissed timoreimann’s stale review April 28, 2017 08:23

I have fixed the review comments

@ldez ldez merged commit 9ed55e9 into traefik:master Apr 28, 2017
@SantoDE SantoDE deleted the fix/rancher_docs branch September 4, 2017 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants