Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update typescript-eslint monorepo to v4.15.2 #2467

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2021

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 22, 2021

WhiteSource Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin 4.15.1 -> 4.15.2 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser 4.15.1 -> 4.15.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint

v4.15.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • typescript-estree: correct issues in AST definition (#​3083) (509a117)
  • add missing intrinsic keyword node to AST (#​3081) (409bf0b)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-var-requires] report when used in type assertion (#​3074) (763a252)
  • correct test names on windows for semantic-diagnostics-enabled (#​3060) (885780d)

Renovate configuration

📅 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻️ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by WhiteSource Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 14e46c0 to ef16a47 Compare February 23, 2021 01:54
@escapedcat escapedcat merged commit 54bfb20 into master Feb 23, 2021
@escapedcat escapedcat deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch February 23, 2021 02:08
This was referenced Mar 7, 2021
This was referenced Mar 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants