Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable Withdraw-Addresses in the pre-send era of cosmos #3252

Closed
rigelrozanski opened this issue Jan 8, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Disable Withdraw-Addresses in the pre-send era of cosmos #3252

rigelrozanski opened this issue Jan 8, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
C:x/distribution distribution module related

Comments

@rigelrozanski
Copy link
Contributor

.ValarDragon [1:38 AM]
I just noticed that there is a MsgModifyWithdrawAddress in fee distribution, doesn't this essentially let you sell bonded stake rewards? Is that intentional? (edited)

Its not technically getting around unbonding periods, but it kinda feels like its in that same spirit

rige [1:43 AM]
I’m not sure that is let’s you “sell” more like “give-away” - which actually could be a problem pre-send enabling depending on how rigid we want to make it - we should open up a prelaunch issue about this. In the existing mechanism you’re correct in saying that it does not get around unbonding periods - it’s doesn’t actually have anything to do with this as fees which have been paid are always unbonded, and this WithdrawAddress only applies to rewards and not to bonded atoms.

@rigelrozanski rigelrozanski added C:x/distribution distribution module related prelaunch labels Jan 8, 2019
@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Jan 8, 2019

Hehe, I had re-implemented this in F1 (#3099), shall I un-re-implement it? Doesn't seem too necessary to have this feature in general honestly (could easily withdraw-then-send in a multi-Msg); we can definitely remove it pre-launch / pre-transfers.

@rigelrozanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rather than remove it why don't we disable it with a global parameter?

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Jan 13, 2019

Let's do that; but in a separate PR for ease of review (F1 has enough as-is).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:x/distribution distribution module related
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants