You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
But probably that is cause BA.2 + S:I68T +orf8:65V is missassigned as BA.2.9 (and brings artifactually the total BA.2.9 +orf8:65V count to over 1000 seqs
When i go calculating its growth advantage considering just real BA.2.9 (with orf3a:H78Y ) this advantage dissapears:
From #524 (credits for the analysis to @corneliusroemer )
i propose here a sublineage of BA.2.9 carrying Orf8:A65V mutation
It reached 466 seqs and it is circulating in multiple countries (Denmark,Germany, Belgium)
Iit has a growth advantage on parental BA.2.9 and over BA.2 baseline:
https://cov-spectrum.org/explore/World/AllSamples/Past6M/variants?pangoLineage=BA.2.9*&aaMutations1=orf8%3A65V&pangoLineage1=BA.2.9*&analysisMode=CompareToBaseline&
But probably that is cause BA.2 + S:I68T +orf8:65V is missassigned as BA.2.9 (and brings artifactually the total BA.2.9 +orf8:65V count to over 1000 seqs
When i go calculating its growth advantage considering just real BA.2.9 (with orf3a:H78Y ) this advantage dissapears:
https://cov-spectrum.org/explore/World/AllSamples/Past3M/variants?pangoLineage=BA.2*&aaMutations1=orf8%3A65V%2Corf3a%3A78Y&pangoLineage1=BA.2.9*&analysisMode=CompareToBaseline&
Very clear on Usher ( tree by @bykudh who first noticed Orf8:65V):
https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/singleSubtreeAuspice_genome_3507e_9f3210.json?branchLabel=aa%20mutations&c=gt-ORF8_65&label=nuc%20mutations:C25624T
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: