-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 377
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scaling from 128x128, to 256x256, 512x512 and 1024x1024? #95
Comments
it looks like it's not meant for progressive scaling? i guess the best option would be to train a lower resolution and then copy the relevant weights to a higher-res network another thing i was curious about was the inputs: def forward(self, x, sigma, aug_cond=None, class_cond=None, mapping_cond=None): x, sigma, and class_cond are clear, but do you have any more details on aug_cond and mapping_cond? |
@tin-sely I believe I believe |
thanks a bunch @madebyollin! ✨ |
My understanding is that you use
On the other hand, if you use
These embeddings are then both fed into the MappingNetwork:
But getting more clarity on this would definitely help! |
hey,
loved your paper and thanks a bunch for providing the code!
i have a quick question, how do you scale and train the network (HDiT) for increased resolutions? i saw you mentioned here: #14 (comment) that you first need to build the entire network, and then skip layers but i'm not sure if this also applies to this new architecture?
many thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: