Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ruby 2.0.0 support #377

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 26, 2013
Merged

Ruby 2.0.0 support #377

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 26, 2013

Conversation

mattwynne
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mattwynne
Copy link
Member Author

@os97673 @aslakhellesoy do you guys think this is OK to go into 1.2.2 or should we do it in 1.3.0?

@mattwynne mattwynne mentioned this pull request Feb 25, 2013
@os97673
Copy link
Member

os97673 commented Feb 25, 2013

I'm fine with 1.2.2.

@ghost ghost assigned mattwynne Feb 26, 2013
@abotalov
Copy link
Contributor

Does v1.2.2 work on Ruby 2.0.0? 1.2.2 is out, this issue has milestone 1.2.2 but travis.yml doesn't contain 2.0

@mattwynne
Copy link
Member Author

@abotalov what makes you think 1.2.2 is out? The current release is 1.2.1

@abotalov
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry. Looked at History.md

@os97673
Copy link
Member

os97673 commented Feb 26, 2013

The changes look fine for me. Hope you will merge them soon.

@os97673
Copy link
Member

os97673 commented Feb 26, 2013

Oops, Travis is failing again on the same spec but with 2.0.0 :(
It looks like you have to use special code for "if RUBY_2_0" branch

mattwynne added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2013
@mattwynne mattwynne merged commit 9faffb7 into master Feb 26, 2013
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Oct 25, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 25, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants