Question about Laziness with Field Comprehensions

[PierreR]

Given a list of struct defined by:

deployment: [ID=_] {
}

There seems to be a subtle difference (laziness ?) between:

for d in [deployment] for _, v in d {
}

And the more simple form:

for _,v in deployment {
}

I have recently realized that both forms are not equivalent. The simple one was failing exposing a bug in my configuration while the longer form was working keeping a bug from showing up.

Thanks for your help

[myitcv]

@PierreR did you happen to spot this as a result of looking at #1134?

[PierreR]

@myitcv yes. So probably a side effect of it.

So I guess it makes sense to always use the simpler for _,v in deployment { and I can mark this discussion as answered ?

[myitcv]

My sense is that there is a bug lurking here somewhere. Do you have a repro?