-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Less active travel in Go Active scenario than in baseline #100
Comments
Well spotted. Can you share a link to the data file showing it? I'm just looking at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cyipt/actdev/main/data-small/tresham/desire-lines-few.geojson and cannot see any negative numbers associated with Go Active. |
In https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cyipt/actdev/main/data-small/all-sites.geojson |
Interesting. Do you know the cause of that? My understanding was that the Or do the |
Another question, if the issue is about the |
I've found the offending line:
I don't think this is a priority, worth getting to the bottom of it after the workshop I think. |
Heads-up @joeytalbot I've just created a new milestone for tracking fairly minor issues like this that we can fix after the workshop: https://github.com/cyipt/actdev/milestone/4 You up for taking a look at the issue at some point? Please assign yourself if so. Otherwise I'm happy to take a look and make further updates to the scenario generation code. |
Is this fixed now? I haven't made any major changes, just fixed Bath, so guess not... |
In case it helps @joeytalbot, I now see this, strange to have negative convertible numbers:
|
No it's not fixed. |
You up for taking a look to diagnose the source of the issue? The desire line scenarios looked OK to me when I checked them. |
We agreed before that it wasn't a top priority. I'll have a look when I get a chance. |
In Tresham (a remote rural site) the Go Active scenario is giving negative numbers of people walking to work.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: