You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From the image and the paper, it appears that $x_{T-5}$ is generated directly from $x_{T-1}$. I am curious about the role of $x_{T-2}$ through $x_{T-4}$ in the calculation of $x_{T-5}$. Are these intermediate steps involved in the generation of $x_{T-5}$? If not, does this imply that $x_{T-2}$ to $x_{T-4}$ can be skipped, eliminating the need to compute them?
Thank you for your clarification.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@fairchildfzc ,
In fact, the output of the UNet is the predicted noise for the current timestep. Essentially, we can only obtain $x_{T-5}$ after obtaining $x_{T-4}$ and $noise_{T-4}$. The core of our method is that noise predictions at different time steps can now be performed in parallel rather than sequentially. However, the predicted noise at each step still needs to be obtained.
Hi authors,
Thank you for your fascinating paper. However, I have a question regarding the diffusion process as illustrated in Figure 3 (https://github.com/czg1225/AsyncDiff/blob/main/assets/fig2.png?raw=true).
From the image and the paper, it appears that$x_{T-5}$ is generated directly from $x_{T-1}$ . I am curious about the role of $x_{T-2}$ through $x_{T-4}$ in the calculation of $x_{T-5}$ . Are these intermediate steps involved in the generation of $x_{T-5}$ ? If not, does this imply that $x_{T-2}$ to $x_{T-4}$ can be skipped, eliminating the need to compute them?
Thank you for your clarification.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: