Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Measure verification time per "assertion" #1597

Closed
robin-aws opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Measure verification time per "assertion" #1597

robin-aws opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind: enhancement Enhancements, feature requests, etc. These are NOT bugs, but ways we can improve Dafny

Comments

@robin-aws
Copy link
Member

Follow-up on the /verificationLogger:trx feature. It looks possible to use the splitting feature of Boogie to support a mode where each assertion in a procedure is verified separately, to gain more insight into which assertions in particular are the most expensive and should be refactored to bring the overall verification time down.

While I'm at it, I should be able to improve how Dafny program elements are identified in the TRX format: what is currently something like Impl$$MyModule.__default.MyMethod should be something more like MyModule.MyMethod (implementation).

@robin-aws robin-aws self-assigned this Nov 17, 2021
@robin-aws robin-aws added the kind: enhancement Enhancements, feature requests, etc. These are NOT bugs, but ways we can improve Dafny label Nov 17, 2021
@robin-aws
Copy link
Member Author

Depends on boogie-org/boogie#465

@atomb
Copy link
Member

atomb commented Jan 4, 2022

From what I understand, the Dafny flag /vcsSplitOnEveryAssert does the first half of this, and the remaining work has to do with naming. Is that right?

@robin-aws
Copy link
Member Author

Split off #1734 and closing this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind: enhancement Enhancements, feature requests, etc. These are NOT bugs, but ways we can improve Dafny
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants