You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is probably going to be a bigger issue, as the UHL in mapPlot() has been, but I'm opening this so that we don't forget about it. Perhaps a potential fix involving the sp package can be applied to the polygon drawing in mapImage() to make a general fix.
Anyway, I noticed the problem looking at the test figure from issue #655, where there are clearly some UHL issues near the North Pole (and probably Antarctica as well):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks. I will be looking into how sp might help with UHL and similar problems. The sp author (email on the package-devel email list) suggests that "beyond the edge" problems are not easy to solve, but I still plan to test out one of their routines for that.
I made a new test, 655c.R, and comparison with the (updated) 655a.R shows that the artifacts depend on plot geometry. Below is the result. (The fact that I've added a new test doesn't mean I am really working on this ... it's more that I'm trolling for any old and ignored bugs that might have been fixed by other work, without an update to the issue because of other work.)
This is probably going to be a bigger issue, as the UHL in
mapPlot()
has been, but I'm opening this so that we don't forget about it. Perhaps a potential fix involving thesp
package can be applied to the polygon drawing inmapImage()
to make a general fix.Anyway, I noticed the problem looking at the test figure from issue #655, where there are clearly some UHL issues near the North Pole (and probably Antarctica as well):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: