From 35a5d9fc05681b0f383a15aa661329bbaa0209dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bob Nystrom <rnystrom@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:06:51 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Add some more tests to pin down comment indentation in
 switches. (#1180)

I spent a bunch of time investigating whether comments in switches that
aren't inside a case body (i.e. not between the "case" line and some
statement inside the case) should be indented to align with the cases
or the bodies.

After trying a bunch of alternatives and running them on a big corpus,
I concluded that the current behavior (always align to the cases)
actually works very well in almost all real-world code. But it's not
pinned down well by tests, so this does that.
---
 test/comments/switch.stmt | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/test/comments/switch.stmt b/test/comments/switch.stmt
index 350e7c21..f74d0d08 100644
--- a/test/comments/switch.stmt
+++ b/test/comments/switch.stmt
@@ -55,7 +55,39 @@ switch (n) {
   case 1: one; // comment
   case 2: two; // comment
 }
->>> keeps one blank line around  case comments in switch expression
+>>> line comment indentation
+switch (n) {
+  // before first
+  case 0: zero;
+  // between
+  case 1: one;
+  // after last
+}
+<<<
+switch (n) {
+  // before first
+  case 0: zero;
+  // between
+  case 1: one;
+  // after last
+}
+>>> line comment in empty cases
+switch (n) {
+  case 0: // comment 0
+  case 1:
+    // comment 1
+  case 2:
+    // comment 2
+}
+<<<
+switch (n) {
+  case 0: // comment 0
+  case 1:
+  // comment 1
+  case 2:
+  // comment 2
+}
+>>> keeps one blank line around case comments in switch expression
 e = switch (n) {