-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for more user defined arithmetical operators #412
Comments
Removed Type-Defect label. |
This comment was originally written by [email protected] Added Triaged label. |
I'm renaming this issue so it reflects its content more clearly. I think adding more user definable operators is a definite possibility in the future, but I don't think that will include the specific ones listed here. The reason is that they are all derived. If you define what + (or - or * or /) operator you want, the meaning of += is derived from that. We do not want the two to diverge. Set owner to @gbracha. |
Added this to the Later milestone. |
Removed this from the Later milestone. |
Removed Oldschool-Milestone-Later label. |
Closed by accident |
Like Gilad says, we specifically don't want to allow overriding the self-assignment operators because users could make them diverge from their desugaring, which is almost never a good idea. (Even C#'s use of Since those are the operators this bug originally refers to, I'm going to go ahead and close this out. Arbitrary user-defined custom operators are a different kettle of fish. |
This issue was originally filed by [email protected]
Support for +=, -=, *= and /= on num and made available to be overloaded.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: