You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, if there's a typo or inconsistent formatting in a unit's name, that unit isn't linked year over year, and its payroll must be reuploaded with the correct unit name in order to be linked. That's a bummer! Update the unit admin interface so, if an employer name is changed (and perhaps a box is checked to confirm you want to merge), and the updated name matches an employer we already have on hand, those employers are merged into a single entity and their data is linked year over year.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related to #553.
Right now, if there's a typo or inconsistent formatting in a unit's name, that unit isn't linked year over year, and its payroll must be reuploaded with the correct unit name in order to be linked. That's a bummer! Update the unit admin interface so, if an employer name is changed (and perhaps a box is checked to confirm you want to merge), and the updated name matches an employer we already have on hand, those employers are merged into a single entity and their data is linked year over year.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: