Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

When table exists in database and no jdbc-type defined, check column type for jdbc-type rather than just using default #29

Open
andyjefferson opened this issue Apr 11, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@andyjefferson
Copy link
Member

We currently just set the jdbc-type to the default for the java type. But if the datastore type is inconsistent with that then this leads to errors. Better option is to come up with a default based on the datastore column (when it exists). With JDO we don't want to allow this since there is a default defined there, so have it controlled via a boolean persistence property

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant