Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include constraints config in model yml #102

Closed
Victoriapm opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Include constraints config in model yml #102

Victoriapm opened this issue Dec 20, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Stale

Comments

@Victoriapm
Copy link

Describe the feature

Adds to the generate model yml macro an option to include constraints configurations by retrieving the column data.

This related to the feature in development in dbt-core issue #6079 and #6271

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

It will be relevant for the supported data platforms: BigQuery, Snowflake and postgres initially

Who will this benefit?

Anyone using the dbt constraints feature

Are you interested in contributing this feature?

yes, I have already tested this in my project

@Victoriapm Victoriapm added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 20, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been marked as Stale because it has been open for 180 days with no activity. If you would like the issue to remain open, please comment on the issue or else it will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jul 19, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Although we are closing this issue as stale, it's not gone forever. Issues can be reopened if there is renewed community interest. Just add a comment to notify the maintainers.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jul 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Stale
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant