-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CT-1492] [Feature] Add support for Iceberg Tables #321
Comments
+1 |
This issue has been marked as Stale because it has been open for 180 days with no activity. If you would like the issue to remain open, please remove the stale label or comment on the issue, or it will be closed in 7 days. |
Any chance to put more light on that? We really need a Snowflake equivalent of https://github.com/dbt-athena/dbt-athena to push forward the adoption of open table format (which, I believe, would be also pretty crucial for |
+1 here! This would be super useful to support for enterprise sas use cases! |
+1 here! |
+1 here! Looking into Iceberg for enterprise sharing across platforms |
+1, Iceberg is now in public preview on Snowflake |
+1 here! |
1 similar comment
+1 here! |
+1 |
2 similar comments
+1 |
+1 |
+1, will work on this a bit in the coming weeks and, if successful, open a pull request |
+1 |
+1 here. We are adopting Iceberg tables as our data lake format and I would love to generate the tables out of Snowflake with dbt. |
+1 |
1 similar comment
+1 |
+1 :-) |
+1 |
Hey all! Thanks for "upvoting", please continue to do so. |
+1 |
Is this now LIVE...? Was slated for APRIL release? |
+1 |
Any news on this? |
Any update? We're looking into iceberg tables on Snowflake now as well. |
+1 |
We will be prioritizing this work over the next couple of weeks. Please stay tuned. |
+1 |
1 similar comment
+1 |
Just to update, I'm actually drafting out features right now. We have a table prototype going if you want a sneak peek. Fair warning, we have some performance issues to navigate given Snowflake metadata constraints. We are actively scoping incremental tables out :) |
+1 |
1 similar comment
+1 |
For those following closely along, we just merged the PR I linked above into
So, the Iceberg table materialization is live for those who like to live at the bleeding edge of our adapters. (we don't recommend this 😅 ) It will take the next 2-3 weeks for us to QA it for Cloud / release in a formal OSS version. CaveatBecause of some metadata query latency, this feature will be gated behind a behavior flag: Snowflake in a future release will alter their metadata queries to remove this latency hit, at which point we'll remove the need for the flag in the first place. Onto incremental models next. |
Closing this out as we've shipped support:
|
@VersusFacit It's my understanding that this is live in cloud today. For core users, is this available in the 1.9 beta series or 1.8? |
@VersusFacit I don't see Iceberg in the docs you linked. Maybe the link incorrect, or the docs have not yet been released? |
hey @sfc-gh-dsotolongo sorry you only see them if you have the Version="Versionless" in the dropdown. This URL with a query param should take you right there. @will-sargent-dbtlabs For core users, it's in the 1.9 beta series |
Is this your first time submitting a feature request?
Describe the feature
Snowflake has announced support for Iceberg Tables, an external table format but with full interoperability as a 1st class snowflake table.
Once this feature goes live, dbt-snowflake should support materializing a model as an external iceberg table.
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Who will this benefit?
Are you interested in contributing this feature?
yes
Anything else?
Iceberg Tables are in private preview as of 2022-11-10
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: