Namespace filter automatically applied after viewing a deployment

[dlampa]

Describe the bug
A namespace filter corresponding to the namespace of the previously observed deployment is automatically applied to viewing any other resource types.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Have a cluster with multiple namespaces.
2. Display deployments (:deploy)
3. Display the details of a specific deployment (describe) by pressing d (haven't checked other ops)
4. Press ESC, and change resource type, e.g. pods (:pods)
5. Notice that namespace filter has been set automatically to the namespace of the deployment

This appears to happen only with deployments and not other resources, such as services.

Expected behavior
Do not change the namespace filter on resource change.

Versions (please complete the following information):

• OS: Linux (Ubuntu 20.04.3)
• K9s: 0.24.15
• K8s: 1.20.9-gke

Additional context
Bug was not there in 0.24.14

[derailed]

@dlampa Thank you for this issue! Hum... Can't seem to repro?? Followed these steps using 0.24.15 view deployments in all namespaces, describe a deployment then switch to pods and pods display in all namespaces as expected...

[dlampa]

@derailed Thanks for the feedback! I just realized I missed one thing for step 3. You have to press Enter to view the containers in the deployment, then press d to describe one of them. Thereafter continue with step 4.

[IvanBodnya]

@derailed Probably, this can also be closed?
I'm just going through a list of open issues to see where I can contribute ;)

[derailed]

@IvanBodnya Thank you for looking thru those. I think this issue is still present. Will need a fix...

[IvanBodnya]

@derailed You're very quick in fixing issues ;)

[derailed]

Thank you @IvanBodnya!! LOL Is this a good or bad thing?

[IvanBodnya]

@derailed I think it's good ;) K9s is evolving! It's an awesome tool! The only downside is that you also have to be quick in solving issues in order to contribute to project ;)

[derailed]

@IvanBodnya Indeed! Thank you for landing a hand!!
Just put a comment on the issue if you want to tackle it and I will keep out. Trying to get back to some level of stability after v0.25.X so pedal to the metal unfortunately ;(

[IvanBodnya]

@derailed I see.. Sure. I really enjoy using this tool. So, decided to make some input into development ;)