You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recently changed some stuff around where I went from type: application to type: kafka-streams.
That - of course - lead to a bunch of ACL creation and deletion events, which ran just fine, nothing to remark there.
However, and I am assuming this is the case for the entire application, the deletes happen before the creations and that caused an issue that - I think - could be avoided:
Due to the order described above, applications temporarily lost access to certain topics resulting in errors.
I think this could have been avoided if the ACL creation of the new rules would have happened before the deletion of the old rules?
Would it be a good idea for a future version to switch the order around?
Or is there a reason why this is implemented as such?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Recently changed some stuff around where I went from
type: application
totype: kafka-streams
.That - of course - lead to a bunch of ACL creation and deletion events, which ran just fine, nothing to remark there.
However, and I am assuming this is the case for the entire application, the deletes happen before the creations and that caused an issue that - I think - could be avoided:
Due to the order described above, applications temporarily lost access to certain topics resulting in errors.
I think this could have been avoided if the ACL creation of the new rules would have happened before the deletion of the old rules?
Would it be a good idea for a future version to switch the order around?
Or is there a reason why this is implemented as such?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: