You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I understand correctly every RealField must implement ComplexField (with the imaginary part set to zero) and every ComplexField must be a super-set of f64, that is, it must be able to represent all values of f64 logically (disregarding machine specific limitations). Decorum's N64 and R64 types logically cannot be NotANumber or Infinity. They thus are not logical super-sets of f64.
For my calculations results of NaN or Infinity are logical errors. I put finite numbers in and expect my calculations to result in finite numbers. I'd thus like to use Deorum's numbers.
My attempt to implement the traits, required for ComplexField, failed at the above requirement. Would it be possible to remove the requirement or replace it by a softer requirement, like Decorum's Real or Real+Encoding?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If I understand correctly every
RealField
must implementComplexField
(with the imaginary part set to zero) and everyComplexField
must be a super-set off64
, that is, it must be able to represent all values of f64 logically (disregarding machine specific limitations). Decorum'sN64
andR64
types logically cannot be NotANumber or Infinity. They thus are not logical super-sets off64
.For my calculations results of NaN or Infinity are logical errors. I put finite numbers in and expect my calculations to result in finite numbers. I'd thus like to use Deorum's numbers.
My attempt to implement the traits, required for ComplexField, failed at the above requirement. Would it be possible to remove the requirement or replace it by a softer requirement, like Decorum's
Real
orReal+Encoding
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: