You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My use case is that I have a voxel octree which needs to be very memory efficient. So I can't store an AABB for every single voxel. That's 6 floats, i.e. 24 bytes per voxel.
Rather, voxel presence is encoded in bitsets, and the efficiency is such that a single voxel can be stored in far less than 1 bit per voxel.
So the issue is that when I tried to impl BVH for this octree, I could not implement fn content(&self, node: Self::Node) -> (&BV, Option<&T>) because it returns a reference to a bounding volume. I could easily generate an AABB for a given voxel, but it would not live long enough to return a reference. The only hack I can think of is to keep an AABB temporary variable on self that gets unsafely mutated to overcome &self, but that may be unsound depending on the code that's using this structure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My use case is that I have a voxel octree which needs to be very memory efficient. So I can't store an AABB for every single voxel. That's 6 floats, i.e. 24 bytes per voxel.
Rather, voxel presence is encoded in bitsets, and the efficiency is such that a single voxel can be stored in far less than 1 bit per voxel.
So the issue is that when I tried to
impl BVH
for this octree, I could not implementfn content(&self, node: Self::Node) -> (&BV, Option<&T>)
because it returns a reference to a bounding volume. I could easily generate anAABB
for a given voxel, but it would not live long enough to return a reference. The only hack I can think of is to keep anAABB
temporary variable onself
that gets unsafely mutated to overcome&self
, but that may be unsound depending on the code that's using this structure.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: