Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
Crouton sets everything up for you, with A fresh install there are a lot of things that you might need to setup your self (like drivers). What computer are you use? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Recently I have been doing a lot of testing with my Chromebook involving Linux. So the first time I decided to use crouton, I love it, in fact, I think it's way better than Crostini. I use crouton daily for schoolwork, chatting, and even playing Minecraft. Soon I realized some issues made Ubuntu more limited than a regular install of ubuntu, like not being able to install snap or using Ubuntu Software. Then I thought to myself, "I should scrap Chrome os because I don't use it anymore on this Chromebook, so I decide to use mrchromebox's script to install Ubuntu or Ubuntu/Debian based distros. It worked, but weirdly it was way laggier than installing Ubuntu using crouton. First I tried Linux Mint 20.1 (Cinnamon Desktop) it was really laggy and figured that it was probably the DE I was using. So I tried using Linux Mint 20.1 with Xfce. Still was laggy, I tried to install Manjaro, it didn't even install. I tried Ubuntu 20.04, didn't work either. Ubuntu 18.04 worked, but it was laggy as well. So I gave up on trying to install Linux standalone and went back to crouton. And Ubuntu wasn't laggy at all, for example, if I play Minecraft on crouton, I would get about 60 fps, but on a hard drive install of Linux, I only get 2-12 fps. This got me wondering:
"Why is a hard drive install of Ubuntu laggier than a dual boot of Ubuntu?"
Can someone please explain this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions