Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x64 lea assertion failure in threadstatic on freebsd-x64 #105588

Open
am11 opened this issue Jul 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

x64 lea assertion failure in threadstatic on freebsd-x64 #105588

am11 opened this issue Jul 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@am11
Copy link
Member

am11 commented Jul 27, 2024

This assertion is failing on freebsd-x64 with debug build suggesting the expected lea instruction is not found, during dotnet publish command execution:

_ASSERTE(false && "Unexpected code sequence");

Commenting out the assertion let us publish the app, so I'm not sure how critical it is. FreeBSD also uses ELF and .so dynamic libs.

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jul 27, 2024
@am11 am11 added area-VM-coreclr and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Jul 27, 2024
@am11
Copy link
Member Author

am11 commented Jul 27, 2024

Found when investigating #105358. fyi: @Thefrank

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jul 27, 2024
@am11 am11 added the os-freebsd FreeBSD OS label Jul 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @mangod9
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@stephentoub stephentoub added this to the Future milestone Jul 29, 2024
@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Jul 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants